What Would A "Full Conquest" of Gaza Mean? – CNN Interview

Miri analyzes reports that Prime Minister Netanyahu is pushing for a “full conquest” of Gaza. She explains that such an operation would require new troop mobilizations and targeted training to enter the last 25–30% of Gaza, particularly urban areas like Gaza City, that Israel has previously avoided due to the dense civilian population and the likelihood that hostages are held there. Miri emphasizes that while militarily feasible, the decision has been held back by the risk to both hostages and civilians. She addresses the destruction already inflicted on Gaza and acknowledges the severe humanitarian crisis, rejecting the idea that the Israeli military intentionally starves civilians but stressing the nuanced responsibility Israel would assume if it seized total control. Miri also responds to recent open letters from respected former security chiefs arguing that Hamas is no longer a strategic threat and the war lacks a meaningful goal that could justify more casualties. She notes that while she opposes Israel taking over all of Gaza, if done, Israel must take full responsibility for its people and not blame Hamas for continued suffering. Miri criticizes the concept of “total victory” as unachievable and calls for realistic, humane goals, warning that continued urban warfare would dramatically increase Israeli casualties without clear benefit. Throughout, she highlights the need for honest discussion, nuance, and ownership of humanitarian outcomes when considering further military action in Gaza.