News
By Anna Gawel
The Washington
Diplomat
New Ukrainian Ambassador Assesses Challenges Ahead
Oleh Shamshur, who was appointed Ukraine’s new
ambassador just a few weeks ago, wasted no time promoting
the achievements his country has made since last year’s
Orange Revolution. In his first speaking engagement
outside the embassy, Shamshur outlined the challenges
facing Ukraine as it prepares for its hotly contested
parliamentary elections in March at a forum hosted by the
Atlantic Council.
The
ambassador spent the bulk of the discussion on the more
positive aspects of Ukraine’s development, namely its
negotiations to join NATO as it strives for greater
Euro-Atlantic integration—a major foreign policy goal of
President Viktor Yushchenko.
“We are very satisfied with the contents and dynamics of
our political dialogues with NATO,” Shamshur said, noting
that he hopes a high-level meeting in the Bulgarian
capital of Sofia will result in a decision on Ukraine
joining the NATO membership action plan.
“We also think that any procrastination or no action in
Sofia will be sending a misleading signal and would
complicate our advance in our quest to meet NATO criteria
and to join NATO. We firmly believe that the goal of
getting an invitation to join NATO at the 2008 summit is a
realistic one—at least nothing in our cooperation with
NATO, nothing in the development of reforms in my country,
precludes such a decision,” explained Shamshur, who
previously served as deputy foreign affairs minister and
head of the European Union Department at the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs.
The ambassador acknowledged that Yushchenko’s
administration has faced an uphill battle since popular
discontent over the November 2004 presidential election
thrust him into power. However, Shamshur cautioned against
underestimating the progress that has been made, or
exaggerating the obstacles that lie ahead.
“We are a country that is undergoing radical democratic,
economic transformation,” he said, citing respectable
advances over the past year in freedom of speech, human
rights, security, corruption, private investment and
market growth.
However, the challenges that remain are difficult to
underestimate. Since his presidential victory,
Yushchenko’s government has been plagued by persistent
scandals, allegations of corruption and disputes that have
led to a string of cabinet shakeups. And now, the party
belonging to Viktor Yanukovich—the discredited
presidential rival that Yushchenko defeated—is poised to
take the lead in next month’s parliamentary elections.
That possibility has left Yushchenko scrambling to make
amends with Yulia Tymoshenko, his former ally and prime
minister whose party is also running for parliament.
Shamshur said that a reunification of the two democratic
forces is not only possible, but “indispensable.” He also
recognizes the significance of the upcoming elections. “Of
course it will be a test for Ukraine—a test of its
capability with the democratic standards in Europe and the
Euro-Atlantic community. The president is absolutely
determined to ensure that this election be free and
transparent.
“Of course, everyone knows that the political situation is
far from being simple,” he continued. “May the outcome of
the election influence our Euro-Atlantic integration? Yes
it may. It may complicate things, though it should be
understood that even under the constitutional reforms, the
president remains the major key player in the foreign
policy field.”
From left, Steven Larrabee of RAND Corp., former U.S.
ambassador to the Ukraine Steven Pifer, Director of
Transatlantic Relations for the Atlantic Council Frances
Burwell, Ukrainian Ambassador Oleh Shamshur, and Jeffrey
Simon of the National Defense University speak at the
Atlantic Council of the United States on challenges facing
Ukraine.
|
Middle East Moms Offer Their Perspectives on Peace
Nonie Darwish’s father was assassinated by the Israeli
Defense Forces in Gaza when she was 8 years old. His death
would become the first in Israel’s controversial policy of
targeted military assassinations. One would think that of
all people, Darwish would have ample reason to detest
Israel, and yet this Egyptian-born mother of three has
come out as an avid supporter of the Jewish state,
denouncing instead what she calls a culture of violence
and intolerance in the Arab world.
Her
unique position and views drew a large crowd to the Israel
Project to hear Darwish speak along with Miri Eisen, who
recently retired after more than 20 years of service in
the Israeli Defense Forces. The unlikely pairing have come
together to launch a series of speaking engagements titled
“Moms for Peace” that is touring the United States this
month.
“It is time to end the blame game against Israel,” Darwish
told the Washington, D.C., gathering. “Palestinians were
rewarded for terror, but those who wanted peace were
silenced. In a culture based on pride and shame,
Palestinians were educated to get their honor back by
terrorizing Israel.”
Darwish’s father, Lt. Col. Mustafa Hafaz, led the fedayeen
guerilla operations in Gaza in the 1950s. His
assassination quickly turned him into a national hero and
a “martyr,” and Darwish said she was encouraged to avenge
his death by killing Jews.
Instead Darwish grew up questioning what she calls the
“devastating indoctrination” of Arab teachings following
her father’s death. “My mother was alone with five
children in a culture that gives respect only to families
headed by a man. They encourage [women] to deny basic
family values,” she said. “I learned hate, vengeance and
retaliation.”
Darwish spoke out against this indoctrination, recalling
“outrageous lies” she was taught, such as “don’t take a
candy from a stranger because it could be a Jew trying to
poison you.” Arab teachings have become the main focus of
Moms for Peace, which was launched by the Israel Project
(along with a TV ad campaign) in an effort to highlight
the “culture of hate” that the group argues is pervasive
in the Palestinian education system.
Darwish’s fierce support of Israel has naturally won her a
strong following among pro-Israeli advocates. But what’s
most surprising is Darwish’s harsh criticism of her own
Arab culture, as she seethes with anger over what she
calls “tyrannical regimes” that she says have fostered
hatred and suffering among ordinary Palestinians.
“Surrounding Arab countries created [the first Palestinian
movement], and now they tell the United States to pressure
Israel for peace when the truth is, it’s the Arab world,
all the surrounding Arab countries, that pushed the
Palestinians into war,” she declared, pointing the finger
at Iran, Syria, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Saudi
Arabia and other “oil-rich Arab countries [that] have
always neglected the infrastructure and economy of the
West Bank and Gaza.”
Darwish argues that Arab leaders use Israel as a scapegoat
to mask their own corruption and incompetence. “Fear of a
common enemy brings unity to the Arab world,” she said.
“Arab leaders point to Israel rather than build schools
and roads, jobs or hope for the people. Blaming Israel has
become an industry. It enabled [Yasser] Arafat to become
one of the richest men in the world while most of his
people lived in poverty.”
Similarly, she condemns Islam’s spiritual leaders for
spreading messages of intolerance. “The Muslim clergy has
failed miserably in stabilizing the society,” she said.
“They whip their worshippers into a frenzy of anger and
rage against the West.”
She stressed, however, that religion itself is not the
problem. “I’m not here to bash Islam the religion … but
I’m calling for reformation for the way that Islam is
taught…. Terrorists who are holding the Koran while they
behead a fellow Muslim is the ultimate insult to Islam—not
cartoons,” she added, referring to the controversy over
the Danish cartoons depicting Prophet Mohammed that have
ignited protests around the world.
Darwish also blasted many other aspects of Arab life,
including the submissive role of women, noting the
problems of honor killings, female genital mutilation and
polygamy. Most importantly though, she decried the fact
that moderate voices are not at the frontline of the war
on terrorism. “I really get discouraged when the media
starts calling terrorists freedom fighters, championing
the underdog, but terrorists are not the underdog in the
Middle East—they are the oppressors…. The true freedom
fighters are the brave moderate Arab voices.”
Darwish said that any solution to the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict will entail exposing the next generation to one
another. “Muslim, Christian and Jewish children should be
encouraged to get to know the other and interact,” Darwish
said, although she didn’t give any specifics on how this
could be accomplished given that Israel and the
Palestinian territories are physically separated from one
another and the two sides rarely, if ever, interact on a
normal basis.
The other speaker in the group, Miri Eisen, spoke less
about her concerns as a mother and more on her personal
experience in the military defending the existence of
Israel. An eloquent speaker who is fluent in English,
Eisen was chosen to be a spokeswoman for the Israeli
military several years ago—part of an overall strategy by
Israel to win what she called the all-important
“battlefield of the media.”
Eisen touted the strength of Israel’s democracy and how
far Israeli public opinion has progressed over the years.
“Israelis talk now freely about a Palestinian state next
to Israel, about a two-state solution. You can say it’s
too late but that’s where Israelis are now, and in a
complete reverse trend, if you look at the Palestinians,
that’s not necessarily where we see that they are,” she
said, referring to the recent election victory of Hamas,
which has repeatedly called for Israel’s destruction.
However, Eisen said she remains optimistic that the
inclusion of Hamas in government will force them to be
more accountable and learn the politics of compromise. And
although she concedes that any solution to the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, if there is one, will not be
a happy or easy one, she believes there is ultimately hope
for future generations.
“We’re not talking about togetherness, we’re not talking
about hugging and kissing and making up, but we are
talking about a real future for the two, side by side,
that maybe the next generation can have more tolerance.”
Miri Eisen, left, and Nonie Darwish offer their
perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at a
recent discussion hosted by the Israel Project.
|
Croatian Foreign Minister Pushes for European Integration
Croatia’s new foreign minister, Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic,
squeezed in a brief talk at the Library of Congress’s John
W. Kluge Center during a hectic U.S. visit to promote
Croatia’s continued efforts to forge closer relations with
Europe and the West.
Shortly
after assuming office in 2005, Grabar-Kitarovic was
charged with guiding Croatia into the European Union and
NATO. Croatia already began accession negotiations with
the EU late last year, and its economy has made steady
progress since the late 1990s. “The political consensus in
Croatia is clear: Euro-Atlantic integration,”
Grabar-Kitarovic said, echoing the sentiments of Ukrainian
Ambassador Oleh Shamshur (see above).
Grabar-Kitarovic, who previously served at the Croatian
Embassy in Canada and the Croatian Parliament, is no
stranger to the United States, having attended high school
in Los Alamos, N.M. Similarly, she pointed out that her
country is also no stranger to the United States, noting
that Croatian sailors came with Columbus to the New World
in 1492, settling in North Carolina’s Roanoke
Island—records of which are available at the Library of
Congress.
The main purpose of the foreign minister’s speech was to
tout Croatia’s successes in privatizing its economy,
creating a competitive market, and increasing overall
stability in the region. “We have become a pillar of
stability and we want to continue to bring stability to
the neighborhood,” she said.
Grabar-Kitarovic added that Croatia has gone from being a
“receiver of assistance” to a “major player” on the world
stage, becoming a trusted ally of the United States and
contributing to the global fight against terrorism. The
government just announced that it will be increasing the
number of soldiers it has in Afghanistan under NATO
command from 50 to 150, and Croatia continues to train
Iraqi security forces outside the country.
She said that the agenda for 2006 includes improving the
judicial system and closing the door on post-war issues
such as the return of refugees into Croatia.
Grabar-Kitarovic, who noted that 118,000 ethnic Serbs have
already resettled into the country, concluded: “I am
confident we can resolve our own problems very quickly.”
Croatian Foreign Minister Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic
speaks at the Library of Congress’s John W. Kluge Center.
|
|
|
|